Headline Posts
T1E1 HEAVY TANK – AN ALLIED TIGER I? (August 21, 2017 1:43 pm)
TIGER CONSTRUCTION (August 21, 2017 11:00 am)
THE MYSTERY OF THE TIGER RECOVERY VEHICLE (August 18, 2017 2:41 pm)
NORTH AFRICA VETERAN REG HUNT REMEMBERS (August 16, 2017 2:46 pm)
VILLERS-BOCAGE VETERAN CHARLIE BURGESS (August 10, 2017 3:24 pm)
Wide Track

TWO WIDTHS OF TRACK

May 25, 2017
10,492 Views

The Tiger I was 3547mm wide and this posed a problem for its strategic mobility. The most efficient way to move tanks long distances during the 1940’s was by train, but the Tiger, with its operational tracks, was too wide.

The Berne loading gauge governed the maximum size of objects that could be transported by rail across Continental Europe. If cargo was larger it might not fit under bridges and could hit trackside objects or passing trains. The maximum permitted width was 3150mm.

Travel Tracks

The 520mm wide transport tracks, which don’t overhang the side of the tank.

The 520mm wide transport tracks, which don’t overhang the side of the tank.

Henschel’s solution was to provide a second set of tracks for the tank. Standard Marshketten (operational) tracks were 725mm wide, used with 24 road wheels per side.

For rail transport these tracks were removed, as were the 8 outermost road wheels on each side. The tank’s side skirts also had to be removed, and part of the front and rear track guard was folded in on a hinge. Verladeketten (transport tracks) just 520mm wide were then fitted. This reduced the tank’s width to 3142mm, just narrow enough to fit the SSyms railway wagons the tanks were moved on.

The tank’s operational tracks, wheels and side skirts were transported on the SSyms wagon with the vehicle. At the destination the whole process was reversed. The transport tracks were packed back onto the wagons after use and remained with them – the tank crew didn’t have to drive around with a second set of tracks!

Road Wheels

When steel rimmed road wheels were introduced from February 1944 the number of wheels per side was reduced from 24 to 16. This meant it was no longer necessary to remove the road wheels when fitting the transport tracks, a time and labour saving development that Tiger crews must have welcomed.

The Tiger II used the same system, except its tracks were 800mm and 660mm wide respectively, so not compatible with the older tank. Now when a unit requested SSyms wagons for a railway move they had to specify whether they needed Tiger I or Tiger II tracks. For clarity Tiger I transport tracks were painted green, and Tiger II tracks red. Units would request either ‘SSyms green’ or ‘SSyms red’ depending on their tanks.

Operational tracks, at 725mm, are wider than the tank.

Operational tracks, at 725mm, are wider than the tank.

Why?

An obvious question this raises is why not just leave the narrower tracks on permanently? The answer is that this would raise the tank’s ground pressure to an unacceptable level – it would now be far more likely to sink in to soft ground and its mobility on the battlefield would be greatly reduced. As much of an inconvenience as the track replacement must undoubtedly have been, it was better than dealing with a bogged tank under enemy fire.

Leave A Comment